Cricket awash with rupees from heaven

We’re sorry, this feature is currently unavailable. We’re working to restore it. Please try again later.

Advertisement

This was published 15 years ago

Cricket awash with rupees from heaven

By Roy Masters

Those lamenting the "Indianisation" of world cricket, particularly the distraction of its Indian Premier League, which has even been blamed for England's recent humiliation against the West Indies, should consider the revenue India generates for Test playing nations.

This wealth is often overlooked when traditionalists focus on India's enthusiasm for the Twenty20 variety of the game. At the recent cricket auction England players Kevin Pietersen and Andrew Flintoff fetched $US1.55 million ($2.36 million) each and presumably were thinking of the rupee when their team collapsed for just 51 runs to lose to the West Indies in Kingston, Jamaica.

Cricket Australia receives nothing from the IPL, although some of its contracted players earn as much for six weeks' work as they do for the rest of the year.

But Australia does very well out of India because of cricket's unique revenue-sharing arrangement where the home team in a Test series keeps all the sponsorship and media rights and pays the visiting team's expenses.

Australia's earnings from a home Test series against India are three times that received from any other national team touring the country. Sales of the TV rights of the tour to India account for this.

TV earnings from matches involving India emerged as a major factor in cricket's economy from 2000 when it became apparent rights sold into India were previously undervalued. This immense TV wealth is a factor of a population which is the second largest in the world; India's passion for a sport which is 30-40 times more popular than the next most watched game; increased competition from sponsors; the growth of its economy; and new technology which has allowed more Indians to watch the game.

An indication of the changing balance of wealth was the IPL final in Mumbai, played at a time the Australian Test team was in the West Indies: hundreds of millions watched the Twenty20 match go down the last ball, while the West Indies received a paltry amount from pay TV in Australia.

CA is very guarded about how much it earns from India touring, rolling its revenue into a quadrennium in order to prevent other countries and other sports from knowing how much is paid.

However, a CA spokesman did say, "In the years 2004-05 to 2006-07, overseas media rights accounted for on average 23 per cent of our total media rights revenue. For 2007-08, that being an Indian tour year, income generated from overseas spiked to 49 per cent of our total media rights revenue." A commentary on the financials in the annual report also notes "…60-75 per cent of revenue comes from media rights". CA's total revenue for the 2007-08 year was $146.4 million and assuming the 75 per cent contribution from media rights refers to an Indian tour year, media earnings were $109.5 million.

Insofar as the international component of the media rights in 2007-08 was 49 per cent, India therefore contributed $53.6 million of the $109.5 million.

Advertisement

Assuming total revenue is the same in a non-India tour year and the 60 per cent media rights contribution applies to that year, media earnings are $87.6 million.

According to CA's admission overseas earnings in those years are 23 per cent, the international yield is $20.1 million.

We can therefore guesstimate CA earns $54 million in a India tour year and $20 million

when New Zealand, Pakistan and the West Indies tour, as they did in 2004-05.

India next tours Australia in 2011-12 and when it is considered India did not play in Australia between 1991 and 1999, it's no wonder the keepers of the game in this country look upon India as a sacred cash cow.

India's population is projected to be 1.6 billion by 2050, 200 million more than China which has a one-child-per-family policy. Thirty two per cent of Indian households now have TV sets, up from 27 per cent in 2003.

Compare this with Europe and the US where TV is at saturation point and in 98 per cent of homes.

But CA also derives money from this mature market and India again is partly responsible.

North America is the third biggest source of overseas media rights, after England and obviously India.

Yet cricket is a minor sport in Canada, the US and Mexico.

"The huge expatriate population of cricket lovers in North America generates this income," a CA spokesman said.

"An information technology expert living in New York, subscribing to cable TV, helps buy cricket bats for kids in Alice Springs."

Most Viewed in Business

Loading