Business

Rates to fight housing booms

Tim Colebatch
February 10, 2010

RESERVE Bank governor Glenn Stevens has flagged that the Reserve could raise interest rates in future to stop rising house prices developing into a boom and bust that would damage the economy.

In a landmark speech in Sydney to a symposium celebrating the bank's 50th birthday, Mr Stevens embraced the idea of the bank ''leaning against the wind'' of soaring asset prices by using higher rates to bring buyers back to earth.

Until now, the Reserve's official line has been that it raises interest rates only to keep underlying inflation within its target zone of 2 to 3 per cent a year over the long term. From now on, it will raise rates to control inflation and/or prevent financial instability developing.

In a long discussion of the lessons of the global financial crisis, Mr Stevens argued that the bank could not stand by and let financial imbalances develop - as happened in the US housing boom, which then collapsed spectacularly, pitching the world economy into its worst recession for 75 years.

But he also forecast that if Western governments give priority to cutting back their budget deficits sharply - as the Rudd government has promised - this would inhibit growth, and therefore could mean ''a lengthy period of rather low short-term interest rates''.

The RBA last week raised its forecast of growth in 2010-11 to 3.5 per cent, putting pressure on the government to bring forward its planned austerity program to the May budget, rather than use the budget to deliver the traditional pre-election giveaways.

Treasurer Wayne Swan has pledged to limit the growth in real spending to 2 per cent a year once the economy returns to trend growth. With the population growing 2 per cent a year, that would mean no growth in real spending per head. Labor has assumed the pledge would not kick in before next year, but the faster-than-expected recovery could force its hand.

Mr Stevens announced the Reserve's broader vision of its role to an audience of many of the world's central bank chiefs and leading Australian economists.

In a paper co-written with senior bank researchers Adam Cagliarini and Christopher Kent, he delivered a veiled but sharp critique of the ''hands-off'' approach of former US Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan. The paper argued that by taking no action to slow the unsustainable asset boom, central banks allowed a crisis to develop - followed by an economic slump.

''The issue is not bubbles, or even asset prices per se,'' Mr Stevens said. ''The issue is the potential for damaging financial instability when an economic expansion is accompanied by a cocktail of rising asset values, rising leverage and declining lending standards.

''There is a large distance on the spectrum between passively accepting asset and credit developments and aggressively seeking to reverse them. Even with the development of other tools, it is unlikely to be credible for central banks not to move, in the next decade, at least somewhat in the 'responsive' direction.''

Some observers believe the bank is already pursuing this policy unofficially, and its three consecutive rate rises late last year were aimed at slowing soaring growth in house prices as much as inflation generally.

The Bureau of Statistics reported last week that Melbourne house prices rose almost 20 per cent last year, on the back of rapid population growth, low interest rates, grants to first home buyers and a dramatic recovery in confidence.

At yesterday's symposium, Mr Stevens' new stance was endorsed by the president of the European Central Bank, Jean-Claude Trichet, and the head of the Bank of International Settlements, Jaime Caruana.

59 comments so far

  • So Glenn Stevens is not concerned about unaffordability of houses for the first home owner, but about potential instability such as the recent GFC.
    Home ownership should be a basic right, not a commodity to be traded for the benefit of bankers and investors.
    The capital gains tax discount, the allowing of foreign investors to buy Australian houses, and the increasing population are all to blame. It is a national discrace that shortsighted government policies have led to an unnaffordability crisis.

    Commenter
    Andrew
    Location
    Reservoir
    Date and time
    February 10, 2010, 7:22AM
  • The reason we have problems with housing booms is our population growth. It starts there, and ends there. Just another price we all have to pay for our fed govts population policy. Why do our pollies think we all should suffer just because they want to preside over as may people they can.

    Commenter
    Andrew
    Date and time
    February 10, 2010, 7:28AM
  • When will economists wake up to themselves? Using interest rates to try and control housing prices is like using a sledgehammer to crack an egg.

    If you have one part of the economy racing out of control, yet the rest remains in balance, clearly there is something wrong with the environment of the problem assett. In this case, they are concerned over housing. Housing is suffering the most basic of problems, supply versus demand. We have a rapid growth in population that is not being met by a rapid growth in housing. For an essential item, ie a roof over your head, this means prices will skyrocket as people fight for the limited goods.

    Solution: Build more houses, don't ratchet up interest rates and screw the rest of the economy. Glenn Stevens is being arrogant and trying to use his only tool, interest rates, to tackle a problem that isn't his to solve.

    Commenter
    Gilly
    Location
    Melbourne
    Date and time
    February 10, 2010, 7:26AM
  • This thread should be interesting to read throughout the day...

    My proposed solutions to prevent the house bubble:
    1) Cut Immigration by a very large % (population reduction)
    2) Exclude foreign investment on housing
    3) Reduce tax incentives for housing investment
    4) Increase land supply to build more housing

    Most of the 'bubble' talks relate to housing within 20km of a CBD. Establish the root cause of high demand within this envelope and emulate these root causes of high demand into these fledging estates..

    Have a great day!

    Cameron

    Commenter
    Cameron
    Location
    Bendigo
    Date and time
    February 10, 2010, 7:49AM
  • Cameron... reducing tax incentives for housing investment will only result in no rental market which will mean those people above the poverty line (and thus ineligible for social housing), yet below middle class inevitably end up in sub-standard housing which creates a whole raft of other issues...

    investors may add to increased 'demand', but they are not the problem!

    Commenter
    Ross
    Date and time
    February 10, 2010, 8:03AM
  • At least he is trying to do something to solve the problem; Governments have known about the supply v demand thing for ages, yet they keep taxing land and housing development because they're easy targets: no one care if developers get taxed because of a hatred we have in this country toward them.

    Perhaps we should all stop blaming those 'greedy' developers and let them get on with doing what Governments have given up doing: preparing land so builders can build houses!

    Ironic that Governments no longer put in infrastructure for house building, yet they tax it: sounds a bit like double dipping to me!

    Commenter
    Ross
    Date and time
    February 10, 2010, 7:59AM
  • Australia has one of the worst housing bubbles in the world, UK,USA,JAPAN have all gone bust! housing prices dropping almost 50% & below in 2 or less years. But hey! we area the lucky country, Says the Australian economist that could not predict any recession or global economic crisis? (except 1). Banks give credit to fast to quick and people are prepared to pay anything for a house, but the Australian people have drown them selves into so much credit that they would never be able to repay it back.

    'Population argument is not enough evidence to support the boom, in the last 1-2 years we are building fewer houses per head of population. BUT in the past 20 years we have been building more houses per occupancy rate if that argument is correct we should have had falling house prices in the past 20 years or so and rising house price in these 1-2 years.'

    Commenter
    Kire
    Location
    Melbourne
    Date and time
    February 10, 2010, 8:21AM
  • Home ownership should not be a 'basic right'. You SHOULD earn it.

    The fact is, 99% of the people who complain about housing affordability could EASILY buy a house. There was a house sold last week on 500+ square metres of land for ~$260K. The problem is people are too picky as to where they live, this place was in Cranbourne - They want to live in the "good" suburbs - well so does everybody, so thats why the prices are where they are. Stop complaining about 'basic rights", suck it up, save your money and do as every other hard working person is doing and save a deposit and earn it. That or move to other country.

    Commenter
    Meg
    Location
    Melbourne
    Date and time
    February 10, 2010, 8:26AM
  • Two interesting side effect of the new foreign ownership rules. Firstly, Reserve Bank interest rates have no control over this form of leverage. The money is borrowed or sourced outside of Australia. Secondly, anecdotal evidence suggests many of these properties have 0 residents.

    Commenter
    calsa
    Date and time
    February 10, 2010, 8:32AM
  • The problem is not immigration, the problem is not tax incentives, land supply or foreign ownership. These are just tiny, tiny bits. The problem is central banking and fractional reserve banking. These two are at the very core of any asset bubbles, at the very core of any booms and busts.
    I don't know what Mr. Stevens was celebrating. There is nothing to celebrate about the bank's 50th birthday. The RBA has been a monumental failure. The value of our hard earned money is diminishing everyday, if your average Aussie stopped working he wouldn't be able to support himself for more than a month as we as a nation have minimal savings.
    RBA, it's time for you to go away!

    Commenter
    Vlad
    Date and time
    February 10, 2010, 8:30AM

More comments

Make a comment

You are logged in as [Logout]

All information entered below may be published.

Error: Please enter your screen name.

Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

Error: Please enter your comment.

Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

Post to

You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

Thank you

Your comment has been submitted for approval.

Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.

More Related Coverage

Interest rate rises in Labor hands

THE head of the Reserve Bank has held out the prospect of continuing low interest rates, as long as Labor sticks to its pledge to restrain spending.