Business

Time to give up debt addiction

Greg Hoffman
May 17, 2010

Video will begin in 5 seconds.

Video settings

What type of connection do you have?

Video settings form
  1. Note: A cookie will be set to keep your preferences.

Video settings

Your video format settings have been saved.

Financial success? Debt-free

Many Americans have redefined the meaning of financial success in the post recession era, to be debt-free.

The first week of May's panicked trading on world financial markets was eerily reminiscent of the post-Lehman chaos of September 2008. Equity markets plummeted, debt markets froze and inter-bank lending rates skyrocketed.

The question is not whether Greece can or cannot pay its debts (without dramatic cuts to government spending, it looks nigh on impossible), but which country is next.

With Spain, Portugal and Ireland in the firing line, it's no wonder banks are reluctant to lend to each other. It's also no surprise that the European Union (EU) and International Monetary Fund (IMF) have orchestrated a 750 billion euros ($1 trillion) rescue package.

The Europeans, being European, took their time. But, not surprisingly for students of human nature or politics, they've taken the easy option and kicked the can down the road. For now, another crisis has been avoided.

In hock

For more than a decade, Western consumers borrowed too much money, ably assisted by financial institutions creating financial products they themselves didn't understand. When the consumers couldn't pay and the banks were about to collapse, governments bailed them out. Remember the calls for a "global stimulus package"'?

Well, it worked in as far as we're not looking down the barrel of another Great Depression. Amongst the recent chaos, statisticians announced that the US economy generated an astonishing 290,000 jobs in April.

But the original problem - too much debt - hasn't gone away. It has just been transferred to government balance sheets. Now, one of those governments can't meet its obligations. So what do we do? We just transfer the problem onto bigger balance sheets. In this case, they're the ones owned by the EU and the IMF.

The buck, however, can't get passed any further. Europe and the US are not too big to fail, but they are too big to bail. It is going to hurt but eventually, eventually, the Western world needs to reduce the overall leverage in the system. And what form might that take?

How to deleverage

McKinsey and Co, a consulting company, recently produced an insightful analysis of 45 prior episodes of deleveraging, 32 of which followed financial crises. The authors conclude that there are four ways to deleverage an economy, and only two of those options are available to the West today.

The two options are inflation and "belt tightening". The latter has been the most common tonic to a bout of indebtedness (16 of the 32 post-crisis deleveraging episodes).

This means cutting back on government spending in order to bring spiralling foreign debt balances under control and the result, in all cases, was a substantial reduction in economic growth.

Inflation might seem like a far more palatable solution and, for creditors, there's no doubt it is. Perhaps best described as "default by stealth", inflation erodes the value of debts and, if you're the supposed recipient of those debts, the value of your assets.

Inflation also reduces the value of all other assets in an economy, creates substantial frictional costs and destroys a country's ability to borrow in its own currency again.

It might be the most palatable option for a leveraged electorate, but for the owners of capital, inflation is a disaster. And once the inflation genie is out of the bottle it can be very difficult to get it back in.

As investors, we should be preparing for one or both of these factors to have a substantial impact on our portfolios over the coming decade. In many ways, however, we should welcome it. It's in everyone's interests to unwind imbalances in global trade and fiscal budgets and so begin the process of Western deleveraging. Otherwise we run the risk of a crisis so big it might portend another Great Depression. From my perspective, the sooner the better.

This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 282288).

Greg Hoffman is research director of The Intelligent Investor. BusinessDay readers can enjoy a free trial offer at The Intelligent Investor website. For more Intelligent Investor articles click here

Poll: Are you concerned about your own debt level and your ability to repay the money?

Poll form
  1. Please select an answer.
  2. View results
Yes

25%

No

58%

Not yet

17%

Total votes: 577.

Would you like to vote?

You will need Cookies enabled to use our Voting Feature.

Poll closed 18 May, 2010

Disclaimer:

These polls are not scientific and reflect the opinion only of visitors who have chosen to participate.

11 comments

  • Surely for the sake of capitalism it doesn't really matter if the debts are piled on the masses, just as long as the precious few reap their unjust rewards at the end of it all.

    Commenter
    Grant
    Location
    Melbourne
    Date and time
    May 17, 2010, 2:23PM
  • I would have thought the other option is to let those in too much debt go broke. Those who were owed money will have to write it off, and the parties start from a fresh. People don't want to talk about that option, but the fact is, people and countries can rack up so much debt that it can't be climbed out from. Bailing them out with more loans might make the problem bigger rather than cutting the losses.

    Commenter
    Chris
    Location
    Canberra
    Date and time
    May 17, 2010, 2:49PM
  • Under our fractional reserve banking system, debt really is money. All money is created from someone's debt. To reduce debt is to reduce the money supply, causing deflation and a shrinking economy. While no one would advocate that 20% house price growth per year is healthy, greatly curtailing debt would also have a deleterious effect. The one main area where debt should be cut is credit card debt. It's absolutely ludicrous to borrow money on a short to medium term basis for 13% to 20%pa. Many people churn this debt over month after month, creating a long term burden they cannot escape. Another area where Australians love to build up debt is foreign debt, because we import too much and export too little.

    Commenter
    Cluster
    Location
    Adelaide
    Date and time
    May 17, 2010, 2:45PM
  • Remember the TANSTAAFL Principle:
    There ain't no such thing as a free lunch.

    The Greeks are learning now, and the rest of the Europens will learn soon, that they have to pay for their state-subsidised lifestyles eventually. I only hope that our own government learns something from this as well and rolls back some of the ridiculous subsidies in our system - especially negative gearing and the plethora of child-based subsidies. Welfare should be reserved only for those who cannot survive any other way and should not be used to prop up profligate lifestyles.

    Commenter
    RED
    Location
    Near the Beach
    Date and time
    May 17, 2010, 2:56PM
  • The unfortunate reality is, is that anyone who is debt free or has minimal debt is punished. Those who spend, spend, spend and rack up huge debts will be saved again and again by a government that will then charge the savers a higher tax. Thus making it more logical to joing the spenders.

    Commenter
    Paradox
    Date and time
    May 17, 2010, 3:07PM
  • I am someone who has always lived within my means, saved for a rainy day and been content with having enough. I am by no means "rich" but have enough to live comfortably without the need for expensive, vacuous toys and possessions (eg: plasmas etc).

    As a result I have a substantial amount of savings and earn a good rate of interest from cash investments that covers most of my living expenses. I work when I choose and enjoy life rather than live like a slave. This is a goal I have worked hard to achieve and have done so at a relatively young age.

    As I understand it, I will be the one being punished in the event of Governments "inflating" their way out of trouble as the value of my savings will evaporate, all for the benefit of not "upsetting" the greedy, reckless, shortsighted speculators in our economy who got us into this mess (hello property "investors").

    I know life isn't meant to be fair, but if the Government takes the "inflationary" course then I will consider that as a justification for the abandonment of my financial ethics and personal responsibility.

    If this happens I will join the herd in buying an overpriced house and negative gearing my brains out. If possible i will set out to deprive the Government of ALL my taxable income by buying/living in the country at a price where I can negative gear AND live off the dole.

    As they say, if you can't beat 'em, join 'em.

    Commenter
    retired@33
    Location
    melbourne
    Date and time
    May 17, 2010, 3:01PM
  • Retired@33.... that is the scenario i'm dreading. I too am debt free, and find that i'm on the outer to suggest that people who are currently debt-stressed maybe should have done their homework better. Not that i'm saying it's 100% their fault - the government should be taken to task for encouraging FHB's at the bottom of the interest rates cycle with stupid grants, however ultimately people need to take responsibility. In this financial era of "bailouts" people aren't learning..... and when this house of cards comes crashing down they won't be able to be saved, and will scream blue bloody murder.

    Parallels can be drawn to Greece. We've had a great party, time to pay the bill... not defiantly say "i'm not paying for this, because i shouldn't have to".

    Commenter
    Geoff
    Location
    Brisbane
    Date and time
    May 17, 2010, 3:54PM
  • We have been forced into debt by our governments, and now the governments will default via inflation. This has all occurred because the citizen has lost direct control over the money supply. Money is just paper debt, and the end game is either we destroy the currency or we continue to hand it over to a higher power. I really would prefer a depression and have low debt and control over my money supply than to give that control to a foreign power like the IMF. Is it any wonder gold it at all time highs!.. that is the only real currency left to protect your wealth.

    Commenter
    andrew
    Location
    melbourne
    Date and time
    May 17, 2010, 3:51PM
  • The state of the western world's debt plus Japan is appalling. Although a lot of it has been transferred into public debt, in Australia we don't have as big a problem with public debt. We have a large private debt bubble of approximately 150% above the 1930 depression levels on a per capita basis. We are not immune from the debt bubble just because our public debt is low. I have been saving trying to buy a property but I believe the property market is overvalued and due for a correction. I am not willing to be a debt slave AND have negative equity in my home. If the government decides inflation is the answer to this problem I will try and buy gold before my money becomes worthless. Watch the RBA and see if their mission gets corrupted by the government.

    Commenter
    bill
    Location
    sydney
    Date and time
    May 17, 2010, 3:48PM
  • retired@33 | melbourne - May 17, 2010, 3:01PM

    Why do you think you're holier than thou when you expect to just "work when I choose and enjoy life ". How are you not being a burden on society when you're rarely producing something. For most of human history until recently people have had to work until they were no longer physically able, or the kidws could support them. Efficiencies in production certainly allow us more lesiure time now but stuff still needs to be done, particularly when our reliance on a cheap third world and inexhaustible environment is called into question. Your approach is cerainly a lot more 'moral' than going into ridiculous debt and availing yourself of the negative gearing rort and then expecting the government to bail you out (though for a more stable society it's galling but probably better if they do), but only by a degrees. Unless you spend a lot of your free time volunteering for various organisations in which case I take it all back.

    Commenter
    miket
    Date and time
    May 17, 2010, 3:45PM

More comments

Comments are now closed

More Related Coverage

Thumbnail image for video asset.Click to play video

Video

Financial success? Debt-free

Many Americans have redefined the meaning of financial success in the post recession era, to be debt-free.

Poll

Personal debt

Are you concerned about your own debt level and your ability to repay the money?

Poll closed 18 May, 2010

View results

Total votes: 577