Business

What's next for rates

January 15, 2010

Here’s a totally unscientific observation based on anecdotal evidence the Australian Bureau of Statistics wouldn’t sneeze on: Australia’s starting 2010 with a little inflationary surge that will soon have the Reserve Bank more worried than it has thus far let on.

There are people returning to work and finding haircuts and cups of coffee are a little more expensive than they were before the holiday break.

Head hunters and more mundane recruiters are hitting the phones, chasing workers they wouldn’t give the time of day to a few months ago. From construction to finance, the jobs surge didn’t end last month – and that’s without mentioning the skills-strapped resources industry.

The two major questions that follow from that are: what does the Reserve Bank think a “neutral” cash rate is in 2010?; and what is Australia’s NAIRU - it’s non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment?

Yesterday’s confirmation of labour market strength makes a return to neutral monetary policy a given. It used to be thought that a neutral cash rate was about 5 per cent, but the banks boosting lending rates by more than the RBA’s official increases has lowered that a touch. And with higher personal debt loads, it’s arguable that the RBA doesn’t have to do as much to achieve its desired impact on purses and wallets.

So, pick another number. Maybe neutral now is more like 4.5 per cent, just three more consecutive monthly rate rises of 25 points and we’d be there.

And, as the RBA has reminded us, just because it hasn’t done something before, it doesn’t mean it won’t do it.  

Also remember that the unemployment rate is supposed to be a lagging indicator, in which case the extraordinary straight-line employment growth since June is all the more amazing, even while being the sort of performance that naturally has any graph watcher thinking that there must be some sort of pause at some stage.

Whether or when the RBA moves beyond neutral though depends on what our NAIRU might be – and that becomes a more painful question for those on the fringes of our labor market.

Given the way the Reserve Bank was increasing rates before the GFC, it looks like it believes Australia’s NAIRU begins with a 4. That’s when the RBA will starting thinking about a cash rate of more than 5.

With unemployment fears removed and consumers spending, prices and wages pressures are on the up – and that was something the RBA has been saying wouldn’t happen this year.

Michael Pascoe is a BusinessDay contributing editor

23 comments

  • Raising rates will encourage Australians to save. Better term deposit rates are great for savers. We need higher interest rates to help fight inflation. Time to move interest rates back to where they were before the Global Financial Crisis. With higher interest rates the RBA will be in a better position to maneuver if the economy double dips in the future.

    Commenter
    Ralf
    Location
    Adelaide
    Date and time
    January 15, 2010, 12:37PM
  • Completely disagree with Ralf's statement. Internationally, Australian interest rates, and rate spreads between RBA and banks, have reached near 3rd world status. This combination kills productivity gains and is a formula for disaster. Instead of encouraging savings it depletes funds in circulation as the squeeze is on for higher interest rate services, one of the most unproductive 'economic' tools. For a country with some much potential, largely due to natural resources, our economic management is sub-standard. A complete re-think and re-approach is needed. We firmly need to move into the current century and decade within... rather quickly and smartly!

    Commenter
    Rene Thalmann
    Location
    Noosa
    Date and time
    January 15, 2010, 1:20PM
  • What will the effect be on house prices?
    How can house prices get so out of line with the fundamentals and not go bust? Maybe it isn't over and this is just a lull?

    Commenter
    House Bubble
    Date and time
    January 15, 2010, 1:07PM
  • This would all be true if the 'unemployment' rate was actually that. In reality it's a measure of those who have registered with Centrelink .... My completely unscientific snap poll of relatives, friends and aquaintances says that the real unemployment rate is closer to 15% than it is to 5%

    Commenter
    Nicho
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    January 15, 2010, 1:03PM
  • I disagree with Rene. Higher interest rates on deposits have encouraged me to save as I have a guaranteed return on my investment (unlike punters who play the stockmarket or take out mortgages as property speculators). Our interest rates should be higher in Australia because our houses cost more in relation to our salaries than in other countries.

    Commenter
    Ralf
    Location
    Adelaide
    Date and time
    January 15, 2010, 1:50PM
  • Reality is that we are in a squeeze altogether that makes sensible decisions difficult, because of past and current errors wherever you look! It is time for cool heads and minds to re-group and formulate future direction, out of the absolutely unnecessary homemade abyss!
    Idiotically high government debt coupled with unsustainable public debt and spending habits scream for higher rates while our largest economic factor, Real Estate, still sells itself under the 'negative gearing' banner long after the last REAL capital gain vanished under a retracting market and ever increasing charges incl. the classic government robbery tax of Stamp Duty that meant to be abolished when the GST came in. Yes, logically, on the current goat track to higher rates, the RE market is due for a bust, unless you find enough dreamers that can't calculate.
    Our focus in re-shaping our future economic path has to be the smartest tool to a smooth running economy that pays incentives to productive and efficient operation coupled with clear guidance to award sensible & sustainable operation over silly speculation and greed traps!

    Commenter
    Rene Thalmann
    Location
    Noosa
    Date and time
    January 15, 2010, 1:48PM
  • Nicho - agree, my partner got made redundant last year and didn't bother with Centrelink. Would assume there are a few in this boat.

    Monetary Policy in my opinion to is not longer blunt enough to have the stimulus impact it once did or to reduce inflation as it once did.

    With fewer mortgage holders (say 30% of the population) you are only taking money out the hands of the people that most need it. Lets face it interest rates have no impact on credit card users. Hopefully higher rates encourage saving but in today's consumer driven insanity people are more like to spend then save.

    Monetary Policy has its place but it shouldn't be the only weapon on the front line against inflation.

    Commenter
    Why101
    Date and time
    January 15, 2010, 2:13PM
  • Australia desperately needs inflation to assist with the rediculous personal debt, borrowed against massively overvalued assets. The rest of the world faced up to this problem 14 months ago. Australia appears to be special, but for how long???

    Commenter
    fatterboy
    Location
    Hampton
    Date and time
    January 15, 2010, 2:28PM
  • Sorry Ralf, your argument has 'vested interest' written all over it. You have money in the bank and are therefore interested to receive better returns. Try to see the bigger picture and I am sure you will come to a different assessment.
    I have hinted at the Real Estate market... structurally it is 'out of whack' and not made to sustainably absorb the current high interest scenario; as such it is in for a certain bust, unless a range of factors change, such as the return on investment.
    Looking at the sort of changes needed, there is no hope in the world that we will see light at the end of the tunnel!
    As such, the RBA and banks should be a lot more careful unless they do not care about causing absolute havoc.
    Anyone contemplating busting the Real Estate market is in for killing the country's economy with massive long-term effects, simple as that.

    Commenter
    Rene Thalmann
    Location
    Noosa
    Date and time
    January 15, 2010, 2:27PM
  • House Bubble - the factors that have driven up house prices have not been addressed and have only being exaccerbated. i read a recent nationwide study (RP Data I think) that had shown housing is a lot more affordable than the press likes to make out (its never easy to buy a house no matter when you were born). remember too, the last boom came on the back of rising rates - an indication that people are making money. boom/bust - who knows, but the issues arent as one-dimensional as they may appear.

    Michael - i enjoy reading your articles, thanks for the continued insight. i get the feeling the RBA may end up focussing too much on the landscape as it immediately appears and end up back-tracking on rates as quickly as they had to last time. the prospects of another economic crisis in the US is increasing daily. the US are having troubles inflating away their problems and without that the prospects of a sustained recovery are low. the writing was on the wall last time and it may well be on the wall again.

    The RBA have shown they are willing to pre-empt the movements in the economy but have also shown they are reluctant to give consideration to a slowdown until we're falling into it.

    Commenter
    Matto
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Date and time
    January 15, 2010, 2:27PM

More comments

Comments are now closed

More Related Coverage

Rate rise a 'done deal' as jobs surge

14 Jan Consumers are looking down the barrel of a historic fourth consecutive rate rise after a surprise surge in jobs showed yet again the strength of the economy.

Borrowers mull fixed mortgages as rates rise

15 Jan Interest rate rises are on the way; so should you brace for the variable hits or cover your back and lock in a fixed rate?

Jobs boom fuels inflation fears

15 Jan Australia’s biggest jobs boom in more than three years may fan inflation as unions strike for pay increases of as much as 30 per cent.