Executive Style

Free to be human

November 30, 2011
1_freedomtobe353

Hey, let's buy some more useless crap to feel better about ourselves!

Been thinking about freedom lately, what with a quarter of the world fighting for it, another quarter screaming they don't have enough, a third quarter complaining theirs is being eroded and, then, the rest of us, who aren't even sure what it means. 

I reckon you could put the vast majority of Australia into the last category; we work as wage slaves, bizarrely trying to earn our "freedom" through a life of indebtedness to banks, exhibiting "an amazing lack of realism for all that matters", to quote Eric Fromm.

"For the meaning of life and death, for happiness and suffering, for feeling and serious thought. [We have] covered up the whole reality of human existence and replaced it with this artificial, prettified picture of pseudo-reality, not too different from the 'savages' who lost their land and freedom for glittering glass beads," wrote Fromm.

But let me back-track for a second.

The truth is, I recently picked up a book titled Free to be Human by a dude named David Edwards and it's got some thought-provoking things to say about the world we live in and how we bipeds with the big brains navigate it.

Edwards is the co-editor of a fantastic website called Media Lens, which checks "the media's version of events against credible facts and opinion provided by journalists, academics and specialist researchers", hoping to show you and me how much government and big business propaganda gets reported as fact by mainstream media outlets.

(Anyone remember WMDs and Iraq? Well, it's happening again with Iran if we're to believe the sources cited by Media Lens, which include unpublished WikiLeaks cables.)

Anyway, it's fair to say Edwards writes to the beat of his own drum and his book reflects this ethos.

I like a bit of shit-stirring, so his ideas rang very true for me on a lot of subjects, such as: "Thought control in modern society doesn't rely on conspiratorial control; it depends on ensuring that the culture is swamped by certain types of facts, ideas and sources."

Edwards goes on to demonstrate how "state and business interests distort our understanding of many political, ethical and spiritual issues, ensuring that we remain passive, conformist and uninformed".

If you were gonna place any words under the Aussie coat of arms, I reckon "passive, conformist and uninformed" would fit the bill pretty well. I dunno what happened to our culture of anti-authoritarianism but it seems to have decreased in inverse proportion to average house prices and national body weight.

It's a theme I visited in my first novel, The Lost Boys:

"It's the dreamland here. It's a VB glow at sunset and a joint to make us think kooky but don't rock the boat, baby. We're full of prawns and fresh bread and cold beer so why even wonder what else could be? Why even think different when this is almost perfect? We're almost perfect? We're all on the edge of sleep, so fat and happy, the prawns are coming out of our arses intact, gleaming, untouched, because we're so full of fresh food, we don't need to digest it."

Hey, but don't take my word for it. See if this idea from Edwards strikes any nerves.

"Then there are wage slaves who are forced to sell their labour to pay for food, rent, mortgages, heating, and so on. Earlier dissidents understood that wage slavery really is a form of slavery. If you have no option but to sell your labour to survive, you can't be considered free.

"To work for a corporation is to be part of a system in which power flows strictly from the top down – it's a totalitarian power structure. That's the lot of enormous numbers of people in the world. If you try to opt out in the UK [read, Australia], you are ordered to 'look for work', mostly different kinds of corporate bondage.

"If you refuse, you will be denied the means to live and can end up on the street, and then in jail. We all have this threat hanging over us all the time," Edwards writes.

The real giggle, argues the author, is that we've been so conditioned by "social manipulation" that most of us not only freely chose this bondage, but dream of it, then plan for it.

"We're propagandised by society to seek freedom in dependency. One of the key purposes of modern schooling is to instil a thirst for ambition and status in the young. The emphasis is on competition, coming first, getting the best grades to get to the best universities to get the best jobs and salaries.

"This version of freedom chains us to external sources of reward and respect. If we believe we need high status and 'success' to be happy, we are chained to the people and organisations with the power to bestow these rewards. So we are trained to actually seek, to willingly embrace, a life of dependence," writes Edwards.

This is a notion that author Joan Didion touches on in her incredible essay On Self-respect when she says: "To have that sense of one's intrinsic worth which constitutes self-respect is potentially to have everything: the ability to discriminate, to love and to remain indifferent. To lack it is to be locked within oneself, paradoxically incapable of either love or indifference.

"If we do not respect ourselves, we are on the one hand forced to despise those who have so few resources as to consort with us, so little perception as to remain blind to our fatal weaknesses. On the other, we are peculiarly in thrall to everyone we see, curiously determined to live out – since our self-image is untenable – their false notion of us."

In other words, if you're constantly looking to others, or society to measure your worth, you're gonna live a pretty empty, sad life.

This links back to that first quote of Edwards in which he says "thought control in modern society ... depends on ensuring that the culture is swamped by certain types of facts, ideas and sources".

My industry - which is of course owned by rich elites and powerful business interests - bears much of the blame for this. Apart from being a money-making concern in its own right, media depends heavily on advertising (roughly 75 per cent of revenues) to survive, so in many ways we walk a line drawn by advertisers.

Says Edwards: "The advertisers' message is always the same: freedom can be experienced through high status consumption and production; benevolent corporations are offering a blizzard of wonderful, high-tech solutions to all our problems. We need not concern ourselves with anything beyond this corporate version of reality. The level of conformity is almost surreal.

"Under this extreme psychological bombardment, it is hardly surprising that so many people are unable to give serious thought to the extent to which they are free," he writes.

It was about this stage of reading I began to feel a bit ill and Edwards went even deeper, bringing in a number of arguments I learnt during my time practising Vipasana meditation.

"Mystics teach that we can achieve freedom by learning to observe thoughts and emotions – we can watch the arising of anger in ourselves, can perceive the anger as a phenomenon separate from ourselves.

"Closely watching an emotion creates a separation because we know the observer cannot be the same as the observed – the eye cannot see itself. This separation through watchfulness disengages the 'clutch' of the mind from the 'engine' of emotions, giving us freedom."

I'm guessing this is where this argument is going to lose a lot of you, where you'll dismiss it as navel-gazing, hippie crud but its credibility is set in stone.

As far as I'm concerned if Buddha thunk it, I'm on board with it. To whit: "It is this identification with mind activity – which is obsessed with the 'better' more 'special' future or the 'golden' past – that prevents us from being present in the only time that really is: the now," writes Edwards.

"Obviously, happiness cannot exist in a future which does not yet exist, nor in a past that has disappeared. Happiness can only exist in the moment. Identifying with the mind means we are never here and now, and never experience happiness. Not only are we not free, we are in a very real sense not even awake, not even fully alive," he writes.

There's an avalanche more stuff in the book, but that'll do for now.

Your thoughts?

Sam de Brito's latest novel Hello Darkness is in bookstores now. You can follow him on Twitter here.

95 comments so far

  • Personally, I can only handle wage-slavery because it supports my drinking, my writing and I don't work very hard anyway (which I've long since ceased feeling guilty about). Now, onto broader thoughts on this topic.

    The internet is the battleground of the future here, I imagine. If there's one thing that's going to kill the big corporations, it's the ability of people to buy and sell without their intervention.

    That said, I don't think absolute freedom is possible. What you describe seems to be the illusion of freedom, some of that ``belief makes it so'' philosophy. Everybody is beholden to something or somebody. Even a man who owns his own farm, even if it is purely to provide his own food, is at the mercy of the weather. A man with a family has already mortgaged his soul for their survival. A man with a dream or a cause is bound to it with his own fervour.

    What if somebody enjoys their work or owns their own business? It's not all that uncommon, and it doesn't make somebody ``conditioned'' if they enjoy what they do. It makes them lucky.

    I'll go with Khalil Gibran (spelling?) on this one - he said true freedom cannot be had if you are lusting after freedom. Freedom comes from not caring. But I think only sociopaths can claim that with any honesty.

    NB - I've never been able to follow Buddha's teachings because, frankly, I like desire. It may be the root of all unhappiness, but I like the way it makes me feel. I like wanting things and wanting to do things and wanting people. Desire gives me something to do with my life.

    Commenter
    AdamV
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    November 30, 2011, 4:39PM
  • Sam, so you reckon you're on board with Buddha?

    He set the bar low for freedom:

    'A good path is free from torture and groaning and suffering.'

    He also reckoned any day that you didn't die is a pretty good day.

    But you shouldn't desire more freedom. According to Buddha, desire=suffering. To free yourself from suffering, extinguish desire within yourself.

    This is the opposite of thought in a modern democratic and consumerist society where we wish to be free to desire and as free as possible to fulfil our desires.

    The true Buddhist path is quite an ascetic one. Sure you're on board with that, Sam?

    Commenter
    roger that
    Location
    at the crossroads to nirvana and hell
    Date and time
    November 30, 2011, 5:41PM
  • Beautiful DB. One of your best in a long long time.x

    Commenter
    shev
    Location
    here
    Date and time
    November 30, 2011, 5:55PM
  • Hi Sam,

    Could you please rectify the view for the comments on your 'Swear' article? All I can see are the mobile phone ads.

    Commenter
    Aroma
    Date and time
    November 30, 2011, 7:12PM
  • Mate, I am often asked why I read your posts, and lately have wondered why too. But then you pull something like this and totally redeem yourself. I'll give you your due buddy, when you do it right your one of the best.

    Commenter
    Gregster
    Date and time
    November 30, 2011, 7:26PM
  • Sorry to say, but what a wank!
    Wage slavery? What's the answer- everyone gets food and shelter and medicine and education without having to work for it? Great! Let's just all go on the dole! How long will that last, though?
    Do we just go back to primitive living in caves/ trees and eating fruit? Would be nice- until a tiger attacks, or your appendix bursts.
    Civilization has developed, and it has many faults I grant you, but a big one of those is the idea that "only slaves work for a living!". Sure it sucks that some are born into wealth and privilege and never work a day- but someone's got to toil the fields, build the roads, clean the toilets.
    And that whole shpiel about "the ability to discriminate, to love and to remain indifferent. To lack it is to be.... incapable of either love or indifference."
    Deep.
    These people- and I include Buddha, or whoever translated him- use a lot of words to say NOTHING!
    Maybe I just don't get it, but I feel no enticement to try to do so.

    Commenter
    Ricardo
    Location
    Bondi
    Date and time
    November 30, 2011, 7:53PM
  • Edwards sounds like the typical parasitic first year arts student who thinks people are just meant to give you something for nothing.

    There are no free lunches in this world. You have to earn it.

    Humans traded loin cloths, spears and caves for farming, swords and huts then corporate life, computers and cubicle farms.

    At every stage of human history you have had to trade labour for things because if you tried to do it all to yourself you'd die of starvation or predation because you couldn't feed and protect yourself at the same time.

    There is no great conspiracy designed to keep you in your place and there is no way of subverting the way things are (unless you want to be homeless and begging for food).

    Our psyche is deeply rooted in this and it is through this that we receive validation because it has always been through this process that we have maintained our survival and our systems reward ourselves for it's own survival.

    Unfortunately, this has been hijacked by the snake-oil salesmen in the "happiness industry" who try to preach ways of becoming "happy" if only we do a different bunch of things according to who they are. It's nothing more than a pipe dream. We are on a treadmill of survival and should expect little more than numb contentment as we satiate our needs.

    Commenter
    Bender
    Date and time
    November 30, 2011, 10:07PM
  • "...and I'll be interested to see if they posit any workable alternatives that society might actually adopt."
    Stormy | Cumberland Oval - November 30, 2011, 7:27PM

    Exactly. That is what I always think when anyone comes at me with one of these wank-pieces.

    Oh boo-hoo. We, in western societies, are being paid more money than anyone in history for doing less than anyone in history but we are slaves!

    I actually like society. I like the things that society provides; comfort, shelter, people to play with and big screen televisions to watch sport on. Part of participating in society is contributing through working. If you don't like the work you are doing then do something else.

    If you are slavishly buying bright and shiny machines which you can't afford, to keep up with some ideal that you have bought into then it is your own damn fault. Quit whingeing to the rest of us about what a moron you are and change your priorities.

    Commenter
    boof
    Location
    sweden
    Date and time
    December 01, 2011, 2:14AM
  • The answer to this problem lies in balance.

    Money, for example, is most important to those who have made it the sole reason for their existance as well as those people who can't afford to buy food. Freedom from this problem comes from working out how much income you need to satisfy your needs and obtaining this, and then not confusing your wants with your needs. Especially by not confusing what other people say you should want with your needs.

    Partners, for example, are important to varying degrees to people. Most people agree that having a good partner drastically improves your life and are willing to give up autonomy for that. However, if someone tries to keep ten good partners on the go at once there life is not going to be very free, or joyous.

    This attitude of balance applies to most things. For most aspects of the world you need some of it in your life, but too much is a problem.

    Commenter
    JEQP
    Date and time
    December 01, 2011, 2:38AM
  • The reality is, and always has been, that the vast majority of humans are ignorant, selfish sheep who actively avoid facing reality and consent to being led and penned.

    Commenter
    El Rey
    Location
    Elwood
    Date and time
    December 01, 2011, 6:34AM

More comments

Make a comment

You are logged in as [Logout]

All information entered below may be published.

Error: Please enter your screen name.

Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

Error: Please enter your comment.

Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

Post to

You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

Thank you

Your comment has been submitted for approval.

Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.