Executive Style

It's true: your boss is smarter than you

September 8, 2011
Proven ... You're boss is smarter than you are.

Proven ... your boss is smarter than you are.

Office managers think they're smarter than the rest of the staff and now there is medical evidence to back it up.

According to research from the University of NSW, managing other people at work triggers structural changes in the brain, protecting its memory and learning centre well into old age.

Researchers have identified a link between managerial experience in a person's working life and the integrity and larger size of an individual's hippocampus - the area of the brain responsible for learning and memory - at the age of 80.

Dr Michael Valenzuela, leader of Regenerative Neuroscience in UNSW's School of Psychiatry, says the findings refine our understanding of how staying mentally active promotes brain health, potentially warding off diseases such as Alzheimer's.

The study will be presented at the Brain Sciences UNSW symposium today, which is focusing on research into "brain plasticity", or the brain's ability to repair, rewire and regenerate itself.

The findings overturns scientific dogma that the brain is "hard-wired".

"We found a clear relationship between the number of employees a person may have supervised or been responsible for and the size of the hippocampus," says Dr Valenzuela.

"This could be linked to the unique mental demands of managing people, which requires continuous problem solving, short-term memory and a lot of emotional intelligence, such as the ability to put yourself in another person's shoes.

"Over time this could translate into the structural brain changes we observed."

The research comprises the doctoral work of Mr Chao Suo, supervised by Dr Valenzuela in collaboration with Scientia Professor Perminder Sachdev's Memory and Ageing Study based in Sydney.

AAP

twitter   Follow ExecutiveStyle on Twitter

104 comments

  • I worked at V/Line for 23 years. I BEG TO DIFFER.

    Commenter
    coma
    Location
    out in the wastelands
    Date and time
    September 08, 2011, 10:34AM
  • They obviously haven't met my boss.

    Commenter
    JR
    Location
    Earth
    Date and time
    September 08, 2011, 10:48AM
  • All these biochemistry effects could just be coming from the sense of satisfaction a manager gets from being on the tier above the drones. Actual smartness could really be trickiness or deviousness and you normally only need to be 1 or 2 % better than others to be noticed, take a running race for example. This type of 1 or 2 % variation would not normally amount for much in medical science. Therefore, I smell a rat.

    Commenter
    bg
    Date and time
    September 08, 2011, 10:51AM
  • "According to research from the University of whogivesadamn, monkeys can do a better job than most managers"

    I work as a technical systems specialist, and I am 50 times smarter than all the managers I've had in the 10 jobs I've served.

    "News Flash, new research shows, that when Australian news cannot find anything to report on, we turn to unsupported research"

    Commenter
    monkey with chopsticks
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    September 08, 2011, 11:08AM
  • Well.. in theory it all makes sense.. And no doubt this may be true for great employers.. But life is not lived in a perfect science lab where all the conditions are just right.. Yes, life is much messier than any so-called one size fits all theory.. ie. Sometimes the wisest person works on the front counter etc.. We all know that life is not simply black or white...

    Commenter
    Darrell
    Location
    Wagga Wagga
    Date and time
    September 08, 2011, 11:07AM
  • You are missing the point... which ironically proves the point! The study shows that the mental activity required to perform people management is causally linked to increased brain health, such as size and integrity of the hippocampus area in indiviudals aged 80+... which is one measure of intelligence ( a necessay condition for intelligence to exist)... Conversely, those who do not perform such tasks or indeed maintain a life-long habit of acquiring new skills are more likely to end up with atrophied brain structures,,,
    Keep in mind this study is ONLY about the causal link between management activities and integrity of brain structures. It is NOT about defining intelligence per se.

    Commenter
    DCB
    Location
    Melbourne
    Date and time
    September 08, 2011, 11:13AM
  • NSW public service managers, smarter, I dont think so.

    Commenter
    Robert
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    September 08, 2011, 11:14AM
  • From this article it seems like a dramatic leap from managers and brain size being correlated to the assumption that management leads to the developement of a larger brain. Perhaps rather than management posititions leading to the developement of a larger brain, those who have made it to a management position have done so because they allready have a larger brain?

    Commenter
    Richard
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    September 08, 2011, 11:23AM
  • Bosses smarter at what? Playing politics? Talking nonsense?
    During my years in retailing for example, I frequently had to endure working under bosses who weren't too bright. Most of them had only a very narrow view of the world and bored everybody with their insufferable right wing political beliefs.
    One ocker couldn't even speak properly. Another with an MBA who loved long breaks, was a poor planner who spent most of her time in her office looking at home decorating magazines and reading her star signs! The same individual was often late for work. Smart bosses are an endangered species. If by chance you have one, count your blessings.

    Commenter
    Mencius
    Date and time
    September 08, 2011, 11:33AM
  • Doug | Eltham - September 08, 2011, 11:15AM
    Yes they have done that research on dogs too so it's less likely to be biased or funded (wild dogs are smarter than pet dogs). What could be construed from your comment is even more disturbing - maybe you always need to act dumb to survive under a manager. If you are perceived as a threat you will normally have to be gotten rid of. Women have studied acting dumb since at least Marilyn Monroe times. Since acting dumb is a valuable survival strategy, maybe they should teach it in tafe colleges. There are probably a lot of highly talented technical people who are being sacked and missing career opportunities because they simply don't know how to act dumb and be non-threatening to managers.

    Commenter
    bg
    Date and time
    September 08, 2011, 11:38AM

More comments

Comments are now closed