Money

Banks in precarious position on rates

Chris Zappone
February 8, 2012

After two decades of funding ever-increasing home loans, Australia's banks have reached crunch time.

With the Reserve Bank leaving official rates on hold yesterday - amid demand for loans waning and overseas funding cost rising - the banks may be forced to lift rates independently to claw back profits.

The choice is a tough one: lift their interest rates and they'll hurt the economy, leaving consumers even more reluctant to take out loans.

Keep mortgage rates where they are, amid the rising cost pressures, and their own pockets will take the hit.

The banks were already warning in the weeks before yesterday's Reserve Bank announcement - the cash rate was left at 4.25 per cent - that they may begin setting their interest rates independently.

Bankers have argued that a healthy banking sector has helped steer Australia clear of the bailouts and recessions seen in the US, UK and Europe since 2008 when the financial crisis first emerged. Australia's big four banks recorded profits of $24.3 billion last year.

However, Bell Potter Securities analyst TS  Lim said that at this point the banks would not risk lifting rates independently  of the RBA because it would put more strain on borrowers, and an already patchy domestic economy.

“Every time you raise rates at a time when unemployment could tick up, especially on the white collar side of things, you're going to put unnecessary stress on the mortgage book,” Mr Lim said.

He described the balance between banks' margins and households' ability to pay as “precarious.”

RBS Equities banking analyst John Buonaccorsi said any bank deciding to lift interest rates now would be entering uncharted territory.

 “There seems to be a view they need to claw back some points,” he said. “The easiest way to do that is to when the RBA cuts just claw back less.” Without the opportunity provided by an RBA rate change, he said banks were unlikely to lift rates on their own .

The decision by ANZ and Bendigo Bank to announce rate changes outside the RBA's monthly meeting has also contributed to household uncertainty over mortgage rates.

ANZ Bank refused to offer guidance on its February mortgage rate decision after the Reserve Bank surprised the market by keeping the cash rate on hold yesterday.

“We said we would review our interest rates on the second Friday of every month,” an ANZ spokesman said. “Until that time, we don't speculate on the future movements of our interest rates.”

The ANZ is set to make its statement early-to-mid Friday afternoon.

Bendigo and Adelaide Bank said the process of banks following the RBA's decisions with their own announcement “doesn't work.”

“The reality is that a bank's cost of funding has a tenuous relationship to the cash rate and it's an accident of history that a relationship exists at all,” said the bank's managing director Mike Hirst.

“Our bank hasn't worked through the mechanics yet, but we are looking to provide our customers with a greater understanding of how the price of their loans and deposits are set.”

The impasse over mortgage rates comes as the outlook for the jobs market grows less certain. Even with the jobless rate at a low 5.2 per cent, a slew of layoffs have been announced at Westpac, Holden and Toyota, as demand for loans and vehicles falters. 

czappone@fairfax.com.au

18 comments

  • The banks have been living it up for years and now they are getting the downside - Twitter:@bankcustomers

    Commenter
    TakingOnBanks
    Location
    Date and time
    February 08, 2012, 12:31PM
  • Enough Profit ? Stop looking just at the $. Look at the ROA & it will show about 1%. If this can't be maintained then they are going backwards. Is that what the yappermaticks want ?

    Commenter
    whatsay
    Location
    Date and time
    February 08, 2012, 12:44PM
  • The big 4 banks are NOT in a precarious position at all. They are simply unwilling to accept even the slightest of reduction in their excessive annual profits. The world (us included) are in a very volatile financial period and we all have to do our bit for the economy to ride out the storm and survive in good shape. That not only means continued wage and debt restraint on the part of individuals, but equally profit restraint on the part of business and tax restraint on the part of government. It is the high Aussie dollar driven by abnormally high interest rates here that is the biggest concern facing our economy.

    Commenter
    MarkH
    Location
    Melb
    Date and time
    February 08, 2012, 12:46PM
  • Q - What is the definition of a quandry?
    A - A Bank CEO who has to decide whether to increase rates (and hurt the economy) or reduce the workforce (and hurt the economy.)

    Of course the best course of action is to first, reduce staff but only those who no longer have a loan (no point causing a problem for the bank)

    Then, when the RBA drops rates, don't drop the. That's why most economists were predicting (read hoping for) a rate drop by RBA. Now, we are about to find out if the bankers will assume the almighty power of the custodians of monetary policy, currently held by the RBA.

    The facts are Aussies were living on credit, which the banks fell over themselves to lend and are now working out how to deleverage debt and by how far (reduce lending for housing.) That's why they know they'll have trouble continuing ttheir growth.

    If the banks are in a precarious position on rates, how do highly leveraged home owners (especially the property barons) feel about it and the prospect of rising unemployment?

    Commenter
    nolongerconfused
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    February 08, 2012, 1:13PM
  • The banks love to talk about how succesful they are, yet the fact they made it through the GFC so unscathed was because of the political restrictions placed on them in the 90s and 2000s and not to mention they guarantee the govt gave them in 2008.

    I love the argument that there interest rates aren;t locked to the reserve banks. If there not in step to some fashion then the reserve has now power at all. I can see that working out well?!?!

    Commenter
    shane
    Location
    templestowe
    Date and time
    February 08, 2012, 1:16PM
  • "The reality is that a bank's cost of funding has a tenuous relationship to the cash rate and it's an accident of history that a relationship exists at all

    It's not an accident at all.
    The banks purposely tied their anoouncement of rate rises to the RBA in the past specifically to engender the belief that there was a direct connection and they weren't profiteering.

    If they have a problem with selling the idea that there ISN'T a connection, they have nobody to blame but themselves.

    Commenter
    Goresh
    Location
    Brisbane
    Date and time
    February 08, 2012, 1:58PM
  • Australia's 'world beating' banks exist in an environment of collaborative oligopoly, which in the absence of genuine competition means that they can do what they like, including charging a level of rates/fees that the cartel believes their customers are willing to bear; short of inciting wholesale insurrection.

    This cosy arrangement also means that with their snouts well and truly ensconced in the trough, generating record breaking profits by both local and international standards, the local banks had no desire to engage in the high risk investment strategies adopted by their international counterparts, in an attempt to satiate their boundless greed.

    As a direct consequence the 'Big Four' and Australian economy were spared from the worst of the GFC meltdown; for which we should be grateful albeit hardly an act of overt altruism. Current whining and portentous claims of impending financial armageddon however is the work of pure fiction, and intended primarily to perpetuate the bank's absolute market dominance and surfeit of profit taking into the foreseeable future.

    Commenter
    Watergate
    Location
    Date and time
    February 08, 2012, 2:50PM
  • Why do the average Australians hate their own successful 4 big banks so much?
    Maybe it's only because they are so brainwashed by the bank bashing media or even worse politicians?
    But I wish they could UNDERSTAND and then decide what do they really want to happen in their life, not only just nonsense complaining?
    1). If our 4 big banks to not make profits, and then go bankrupt and forces our country to end up like the PIGS in Europe with unemployment of over 20% and house prices crashing up to 50%?
    2). Since the 4 big banks make up half of the ASX stock market, they maybe want 50% of their super savings to vanish and then face a poverty line lifestyle in their own future retirements?
    AUSTRALIANS please learn to love our very own World beating AA+ rated banks as they saved your own bacon in the ravishing sub prime. And will look after your retirement savings in super or even better as one of the 100's of thousands of direct shareholders & self funded retirees receiving a fully franked TAX FRRE dividend flow over your lifetime.
    Borrowers think of long term life gain in retirement for only some short term pain now!

    Commenter
    Common sense
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    February 08, 2012, 11:20AM
  • Excuse me but haven't they made enough profit in a year!

    Commenter
    Huddy
    Date and time
    February 08, 2012, 11:21AM
  • uBank uSaver is paying savers 6.01% interest, while uHomeloan is charging 6.14%. How much tighter can it get?

    Imagine if McDonalds charged $6.14 for a BigMac meal when it costs them $6.01 to make it. And we all know a Big Mac meal doesn't cost anywhere close to $6 so such margins will never ever happen anywhere else in business.

    Commenter
    ... guess what google found ...
    Date and time
    February 08, 2012, 11:40AM

More comments

Comments are now closed