Small business

Giving rise to Australia's potential

August 29, 2011
How can we encourage a new generation of innovators and entrepreneurs?

How can we encourage a new generation of innovators and entrepreneurs?

How does Australia unleash a new generation of entrepreneurs who create and commercialise ideas, experiment and take risks, fail and succeed, and build wealth for themselves and the community? A generation of young entrepreneurs who, over time, will help this country stimulate higher innovation, lift productivity and wean itself off the mining boom.

The Venture will address these issues in a series of blogs on start-up entrepreneurship over coming weeks. The series aims to stimulate debate on how this country can encourage and help a new generation of innovators and entrepreneurs pursue their dreams and succeed in business ventures. The goal is to give more voice to smaller enterprises in a business debate that is always dominated by big companies.

There is so much potential if tens of thousands of young people pursue innovation and entrepreneurship, in their own venture, large company or not-for-profit. The pay-off may take years and will only happen if some big obstacles to start-up entrepreneurship are lessened through innovative thinking. We have to start somewhere.

This is where you, the reader, can help. Send through your ideas on how the federal and state governments can encourage and assist start-up entrepreneurship and innovation.

Make a noise. We need fresh voices and ideas.

What’s your view?

  • What will it take for young people to start ventures, rather than waste years in a series of dead-end corporate jobs?
  • How do we help a new generation create their job rather than simply apply for it?

Last week’s blog, ‘Rethinking entrepreneurship education’, looked at a key obstacle for young entrepreneurs: access to finance. It argued for a radical rethink of student loans, to combine university business education with low-cost government funding, to start a venture. Many thanks to readers who emailed suggestions and encouraged me to pursue this idea.

This week’s contribution argues that young people need more exposure to fast-growth entrepreneurship and innovation concepts much earlier in their training. All too often, these concepts are taught in stand-alone business degrees, when the real potential is embedding entrepreneurship subjects into specialist degrees across a wide range of disciplines.

I once taught opportunity evaluation to a group of final-year undergraduate engineering students. It was easily the most promising class I taught, and miles ahead of those studying general business degrees. Watching bright young engineers embrace entrepreneurship concepts and apply them to their inventions was a privilege. I wondered why so much business education is taught as a stand-alone discipline when the real entrepreneurs arguably don’t need it.

Yes, I know many university courses allow undergraduate students to take business course electives, or offer such subjects in their degree. A law degree might offer a subject in practice-management, for example, or a pharmacy degree might offer training in running a business. And many students combine degrees, such as business and law.

Much of this training is about managing resources, rather than the entrepreneurial mindset of identifying and managing opportunities.

Imagine if more universities embedded one or two entrepreneurship and innovation subjects into their undergraduate specialist degrees. Imagine if someone studying a nursing degree, for example, was exposed to innovation concepts early in their training. Maybe they do nothing with it. Maybe they take a more innovative mindset to their first job and find new ways to help patients. Maybe, if they think of a new device or service, they have the skills to turn their idea into commercial reality, or know where to get further training should they wish to start a venture.

We cannot wait for young people with specialist degrees to learn about entrepreneurship a decade later in a costly MBA degree. Nor can we afford to think of entrepreneurship and innovation as 'business concepts', when they should be fundamental in every industry and company. We must encourage more 'accidental innovation' by combining entrepreneurship subjects with specialist disciplines, and help young people who may have never considered themselves innovators or entrepreneurs to find their business spark if they have one.

Most of all, we must give young students greater choice. They should not feel that a university degree only prepares them for a corporate job or traditional employment path. Exposing more students of specialist degrees to entrepreneurship education might encourage them to take further business training, and eventually start a venture. Such training must be handled carefully; we should never glamorise start-up entrepreneurship or downplay the risks. But nor should we assume young people with no business experience cannot manage these risks, with proper training or mentoring.

Generation Y is potentially capable of more start-up entrepreneurship than Generation X or the baby boomers, because it is more adaptive and, in its own way, more resilient.

For this idea to work, universities must encourage more collaboration between their business faculties and other departments – easier said than done. Perhaps various industry bodies can encourage universities to embed at least a few entrepreneurship and innovation subjects into specialist degrees. Perhaps key employers can promote the benefits of students with specialist degrees having at least some entrepreneurship and innovation training, so that students seek out such courses to improve their employment prospects. Perhaps the federal government can encourage more entrepreneurship and innovation training in specialist degrees through the course accreditation process.

I don’t know what the answer is. But I do know that exposing tens of thousands of young people to innovation concepts before they enter the workforce will plant the seeds for a new generation of entrepreneurs who don’t wait until they have been retrenched, or are numb from a corporate job, before starting a venture.

 

17 comments so far

  • Firstly, entrepreneurial thinking does not begin in university...it begins in High School. The idea of running your own business and the notion that this is achievable should be bred into young kid's minds through programs instilled in the high school curricula. Subjects like Accountancy and Business Economics are not given much, if any, emphasis and recognition in High Schools and therefore kids do not look at Entrepreneurship as a career.
    High School should be the breeding grounds for this "exposure."

    Commenter
    rajun
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    August 30, 2011, 9:03AM
  • I have always found that hard work is required for success.Does not matter what generation you are. Ideas people need to work hard as well. Innovative ideas should be feasible not fanciful. We cannot rely on the government for everything,we have to stand on our own two feet.

    Commenter
    wayneo
    Date and time
    August 29, 2011, 8:58PM
  • You write correctly of university training. That's basically what happens in law, engineering, medicine. Any education that occurs is more by good luck than design. I read a great article in the Financial Times by a philosophy PhD who ran a consulting firm arguing that he'd learnt more about running a business from Nietzsche than from business courses. Business courses design imagination out and put standardisation in. Where are students allowed, encouraged, to be creative? These days universities are highly risk-averse and this message gets through to students. They train for 'outcomes', run everything on templates, are more into compliance than autonomy and the exercise of judgment. That is, they seek to train students like seals, to equip them with 'skill sets' rather than liberate their imaginations, to profit from their enrolments rather than take a pastoral approach to their development. This is not a criticism of skills training (I want competent professionals!) but to argue that universities seem unable to walk and chew gum at the same time. And if you have this argument with them, they will point to that 'realities' of modern education, i.e. reasons not to innovate. Don't hold your breath waiting for such conservative and bureaucratic organisations to encourage young entrepreneurs!

    Commenter
    Gubbio
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    August 30, 2011, 7:43AM
  • Since we're challenging universities in how they structure their education to prepare their students for the real world, we should also challenge whether universities should be the primary source of "entrepreneurial" education.

    The points Tony raises are valid, but going from my own personal experience, and from talking to students of business degrees, there has, and still is, a big disconnect between what is taught in universities about the theoretical world of business, and what really happens practically in the real world when money hits the road, you have cash going out the door, a team of people to feed, a partner to support, etc...

    Nothing personal against academics of course, many of whom have come up with many important and vital concepts / theories / methodologies over the years. But what entrepreneurs and business owners need aren't theories, but real experience and practical knowledge that works. And that's something a lecturer working through a textbook can't replicate.

    So while, yes, maybe universities need to step up their game, we should also be asking the question, "Are universities the place to go?" if one wants to become an entrepreneur.

    Commenter
    L
    Date and time
    August 30, 2011, 12:35AM
  • The universities/Government need to offer a years free use of small rooms (similar to the library study rooms) to 2/3 entrepreneurs located at or near the university. The condition is that the university holds 20% of the startup company and supplies the legals and free/subsidised use of libraries/equipment and some hours of advice/assistance.
    The startup people are advised to attend a lean and strategic business course with appropriate financial punishment upon any such failing of such course.
    Straight after uni is best as the ex students are used to living on ramen.

    Commenter
    Adam
    Date and time
    August 30, 2011, 12:18AM
  • There is always Australian Business Week (http://www.abw.org.au) which gives high school students entrepreneurial experience.

    There used to be the Young Achievement Australia award but I now find out the program has died from withdrawn funding (http://mosman-daily.whereilive.com.au/news/story/govt-pulls-plug-on-youth-program/)

    So support ABW in your local school and perhaps we should bring YAA back....

    Commenter
    ForTheRecord
    Location
    Wahroonga
    Date and time
    August 30, 2011, 5:38PM
  • Innovation and entrepreneurial require a fundamental acceptance of failure, however, I agree that it is not how we are educated, or even raised. Some of the problem could be with the very word 'failure' because realistically it doesn't convey how an entrepreneur thinks: although one idea may have 'failed', they don't consider it any more than 'that way didn't work', and then, based on understanding why it didn't work, they evolve the idea and keep trying.

    Perhaps a better way to think about it is persistence: do we teach enough of this? As a society do we encourage it?

    Commenter
    Ross
    Date and time
    August 31, 2011, 2:49PM
  • Also Steve's Blank's blog is excellent. He taught a uni subject on entrepreneurship where people actually did it. He chronicled it on his blog.

    Australian Uni's are probably the worst possible place to try and do a course in entrepreneurship. I think they would have to employ an entrepreneur and let them do what they like with the course. Maybe they could farm it out to another organisation and give credit.

    Commenter
    Evan Hadkins
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    September 04, 2011, 12:32PM
  • One thing that would help is if employers were more open to employees having side projects. The comfort of having a salary while you test a product is huge. This sometimes happens in IT, but to my knowledge is not prevalent elsewhere.

    It would probably need government involvement to reduce the restrictions placed on employees in their work contracts.

    Commenter
    Entrepreneur Wannabe
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    August 29, 2011, 3:10PM
  • This article couldn't be true enough. As an engineer/architect I'm spending my final year doing my thesis in innovation theory and design management, and in doing so am also pursuing my first corporate venture.

    I think that the innovations that Gen Y procure are completely different due to our integration with technology. As I've found out, perhaps it is not just the 1 or 2 extra business courses they need, but instead ones in programming or logistics also. I took a course last semester in Strategic Management, and I recommend it to everyone i meet simply because it has none of that formulaic, rigid teaching and learning that other courses do, but instead lets the student explore business ideas and concepts through a variety of management and strategic tools.

    As you stated though, money comes into it big time. I'm running through my savings now, unable to work due to the time commitment of a venture + other uni subjects. Grant support is key to seeing projects off the ground, definitely. Along with a steely determination.

    Commenter
    Jaryd C
    Location
    Menai
    Date and time
    August 29, 2011, 8:52PM

More comments

Make a comment

You are logged in as [Logout]

All information entered below may be published.

Error: Please enter your screen name.

Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

Error: Please enter your comment.

Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

Post to

You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

Thank you

Your comment has been submitted for approval.

Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.

Advertisement